Ezigrade (version 2)

Grading Menu

This option calculates a number of appropriate parameters applicable to each section. It fills in these values in the appropriate sections in the info bar to the left of Ezigrade.
Also if the min/max grades for grading constraints aren't set then these values are changed to the best fit plane. This is a useful guide if you wish to set the slopes when doing a plane design. You often do this when you wish to match neighbouring planes.
Grading - grid and triangle based
We have supplied two different methods of creating the graded output. They are grid based and triangle based. The legacy method used since day1 is based on gridding the data and working on this. The triangle based method works directly upon the triangles which is a better representation of the base job.
Here are some plus's and minus's of the two different methods:
  • grid based allows you to represent a large job by a relatively coarse grid which can give a faster result.
  • the grid by definition can lead to loss of features as you are representing the job by a series of discrete points
  • the triangle based represents the surface as accurately as we can using the given data.
  • the triangle based is going to give a more rigorous result.
  • triangle based and large job can give large processing time.
  • grading where we make water flow to the edge is only supported using the triangle method.
  • maximum cut constraint only works with triangle method.
Clicking on the Grading (grid based)
Please note that if you are doing plane design's only then you can simply click OK. If you wish to smooth between planes then the smoothing options can be used.
Clicking on the Grading (triangle based)
If you are doing planes of best fit then tick the appropriate tick box for either doing a "least squares" solution or alternatively a "linear programming" solution. The least squares solution calculates the plane of best fit by minimising the sum of the least squares difference to all the points in the job. The linear programming solution consists of putting all the points into a mega-big matrix and manipulating it to mimimise a function that approximates the total cut volume.
Or for a non-technical difference. The least squares is quicker but not as accurate. In practice the difference is not that much and probably not worth worrying about.
The following are features that apply to both methods:
Smoothing and Sampling Values.
After the field is graded so that either a plane or constrained grades are produced you have the option of smoothing the surface. This is a bit like running a fine grader over the surface. Smoothing the surface is a good idea as it reduces change of grades and leads to better water run-off.
Many designers simply do the smoothing on appropriate fields. We have been getting positive feedback on this option. Many users prefer this to an alternative method of limiting the change in grade ( for those mathematically inclined - the second differential of the surface).
The smoothing is based on least squares and it uses two parameters. The "sampling" distance is how far to look to pick up points to be used in smoothing. The "smoothing" distance affects how the importance of the points are weighted. A low value means close in points have more influence while larger value means further out points give an influence as well.
The larger these values are the smoother the surface. If you make the values large in relation to the field then you will basically end up with a plane. Make them both small and there will be little effect.
Here are some sample's from a real job and shows the effect of these values:
When doing a design like this you can trade off the smoothness of the finished surface with the amount of dirt that needs to be removed.
Example1: No smoothing.
Cut Value -10656
Fill Value     8881
Example 2: smoothing values of 20 and 30 respectively
        Cut Value  -11154
        Fill Value      9296
Example 3:  smoothing values of 40 and 60 respectively
      Cut Value  -12008
      Fill Value     10007
Example 4:  smoothing values 80 and 120
      Cut Value  -13219
      Fill Value    11015
Example 5:  smoothing values 160 and 240
      Cut Value  -14400
      Fill Value    12001
Grade Current Field
This gives you the option of doing a single field in the job. It defaults to using a triangle based solution.

Made with help of DrExplain

TODO: Change the footer's content in Project Settings : HTML (CHM) Export : Setup HTML Template and Layout